We have had paraplanners in this country for 20 years, maybe 25. Our largest professional body, the Personal Finance Society is only just 15 this year, and so we are a profession that is still very much in it’s infancy. It’s fantastic that we are aspiring to get as qualified as we can, but qualifications aren’t everything.
There is also the quandary that the definition, responsibilities and tasks of a paraplanner vary from firm to firm. At the moment, the market dictates what is required of a paraplanner. What one business wants from theirs is likely to be very different from another. There are many similarities between the roles for each business but there is yet to be a common definition that most people agree actually is the role.
‘Paraplanners are not just report writers’ is something else that often comes up. No, they are not but what’s wrong with report writing anyway? Many paraplanners started there, myself included, and it’s a great introduction into the profession. Report writing is itself a skill. Being able to take information about a client in a fact find or file note, along with research, advice and recommendations that someone else has prepared, and present these in an articulate, clear and simple way that a client will understand is itself an acquired skill. I’ve worked with many highly qualified paraplanners who were chartered and fellow, whose technical knowledge was second to none but could not articulate the recommendations in a way that a client would be able to understand and follow. In fact, on occasions, I found myself, a qualified and experienced paraplanner, s truggling to follow exactly what a report was recommending and why, for all the technical info and jargon that was being used.
I’m not disputing that it is necessary to have a really thorough technical understanding to be a great paraplanner. I agree that working to be Chartered and Fellow has improved me as a paraplanner, but these are not the only thi
ngs required. I have spent years learning how to improve my communication and writing skills, learning practical skills such as cashflow and using research tools, and gaining experience to try and be the best I can.
So back to the point in question, you need to be Level 4 to be able to call yourself a paraplanner? Level 4 can be completed in a year. Does this mean that someone who has no previous financial planning or paraplanning experience can complete this in twelve months and then call themselves a paraplanner but someone who is Level three, with many years experience, excellent paraplanning skills and technical knowledge from CPD cannot? That makes no sense to me at all. In my view, if you are doing paraplanning, you are a paraplanner.
I would also ask if you were one of these paraplanners and someone told you that you can’t be called that now, what sort of message does that send?